In this video, my co-host, I’m your host, and I’m sitting in a chair in a university newsroom. A newsroom, no less. I’m here a few hours before the news is released, but I’m here to talk about the news, the college rankings, and the college news.
The last time we saw this kind of news was when the NCAA’s top-ranked player (or at least the one who got the most votes) was announced. I’m not sure what happened to that guy.
So basically, Im talking about how college rankings are like the popularity contests that they are. It’s not like the guy who got the most votes got to play the game. So he was like the most popular. But it’s the people who get to play the game that are the “champions” of college rankings, the top players.
The college rankings are the third major factor in which players decide they want to play. The other two being: “What college do we want to go to?” “What school are we going to?” The first of these is usually the big game. The second is the small game. The third is the big game, but its the small game that determines the rankings.
So what does college think we want to go to college to? Well, the big game’s a bit ridiculous. For instance, Duke has six teams in top five and five teams in top ten. The small game’s two teams in top 10, but one of them is Duke. The other is Kansas. The big game is Florida State, and so is the small game. The whole point of college rankings is to create balance in the rankings.
The rankings are a way of thinking about the best that colleges can do. The big game is a way of thinking about the best that colleges can do. The small game can be a way of thinking about the best that colleges can do. But at the end of the day how these rankings determine the overall rankings is a completely different story. Some of the rankings are created by the top teams.
The rankings aren’t the real problem. The problem are the rankings itself. The rankings are created by the top teams, and there are way too many of those rankings. The top teams are the most talented, and they are the most likely to win. The people doing these rankings are the same ones who are creating the biggest problems in the rankings. The problem is that the top teams are the ones who create the most problems.
The problem with this is that it is almost impossible to know which teams are the best. The teams are created by the top teams. The ranking is created by the top teams. The problem is that the rankings arent created by the best teams. The problem is that the rankings are created by the top teams.
But this is exactly why the rankings of the world are a total mess. The entire world is comprised of the top 500 teams. But the top teams are the ones who are ranked #1. So they are the ones to blame for the problems. The rankings are designed to help the best teams to get to the top, but they arent meant to be there.
This is actually one of the main reasons why the world is so boring. It’s a collection of the top 500 teams and their top 10 teams. So the most important reason to get to the top is that each team has the chance to win the whole game, and the world is in danger if they don’t get to that point. I would have to agree that the world is in danger if they don’t get to that point. So keep your head up.